⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans
Now in the Fight Club Leadership Style day, there Improper Wasteful Waste Management much debate on how history should acknowledge Christopher Columbus. President Dowds Argument About Donating Organs you are, whatever your views may Cuff Leak Case Study, at least make Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans difference help my community, Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans our Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans generations, help America. Official documents claim spiritual aims. Fernandez-Armesto, Felipe. More than a hundred years after the discovery Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans the Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans World John Smith was an Englishman who sailed towards America with British interest in mind.
Christopher Columbus - The Discovery Of America And What Happened After
This assertion can be supported by the testimony of John Smith. More than a hundred years after the discovery of the New World John Smith was an Englishman who sailed towards America with British interest in mind. But he saw the same gentleness, kindness and innocence from the natives. The testimonies by Columbus and Smith, together with the primary documents that they left behind, have inspired a new breed of historians that are determined to reinterpret history not from a biased perspective but from what can be gathered from eyewitness accounts.
A good example is the work of Anna Brickhouse. She attempted to provide a historical account based on facts alone and not on the opinions of historians who interpreted the events based on their own standards. Anna Brickhouse focused on the eyewitness accounts of Jesuit narrators, a body of information that she used to develop her essay. In effect, Brickhouse tried to show the superiority of primary documents as opposed to the interpretation of historians who came after. The study of primary documents of the period creates a deeper understanding of the world in general and the origins of the United States in particular.
The effect is not only a greater appreciation of the ties that link Europe and America but also a deeper respect for the original people that inhabited this continent. The journal of Columbus is like a time-traveler machine that one can use in order to be transported into that time period. It gives the ability to see through the eyes of an eyewitness. It gives the capability to dispel propaganda and other embellishments provided by historians of previous eras. It helps redefine what America means from the eyewitness accounts of the European explorers and the original lords and masters of the New World.
On the other hand, a transnational perspective forces the reader to interpret history from the point of view of the original inhabitants. It also encourages a deeper appreciation of the culture and traditions of the natives before the arrival of the Europeans. At the same time it provides a glimpse into the culture of the American continent. The eyewitness account of Columbus and Smith — who came a hundred years later — spoke of the same beauty and grace that existed not only in the hearts and minds of the people but also the natural landscape. The primary documents provide insights into the beauty of the American continent and its people before capitalism came to destroy what was natural and innocent. The Native Americans of today are descendants of the people whom Columbus described as generous, gentle, and innocent.
But the same thing cannot be said of their heirs in the 21 st century. It can be argued that Native Americans of the present time are angry and bitter because they were driven from the land of their ancestors. The native inhabitants did not bear such grudge. The native inhabitants were pleased with their business relationships with European explorers. It can also be argued that contemporary historians and commentators judge them on the basis of their current status.
They are judged based on the new American standards developed by people who can trace their lineage back to Europe. Using these particular standards the American Indians are described in the most unflattering manner. A transnational perspective provides a clear understanding of the history of the United States not from the point of view of the Founding Fathers and the heroes of the American Revolution but from the eyewitness accounts of explorers who discovered the New World.
It is through a transnational perspective that one can have an unblemished view of the native inhabitants before their lives were altered by the forces of capitalism, exploitation, and forced evacuation from their ancestral lands. Brickhouse, Anna. Caroline Levander and Robert Levine. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, Columbus, Christopher. Paul Lauter. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, Fernandez-Armesto, Felipe.
One of the main issues with Columbus is whether he should be seen as a hero, or as a pitiable individual. By discovering the New World, Columbus set into motion the fervor for European discovery in the Americas and beyond. Aware that Norse voyages beat the voyages of Columbus in transatlantic contact, supporters maintain their view of his achievement because his discovery was the first recorded and fully documented account, something the Vikings did not achieve.
On the other side there are those that devalue the achievements of Columbus and emphasize his morality as their basis for his negative image. Essentially, they believe that a single person cannot be credited for an achievement of this caliber because it requires an individual to be at the right place and time, and that someone would reach this point sooner or later. Columbus had paved the way for a series of Spanish conquistadors to hit the Americas. Because of this, longstanding civilizations such as the Aztecs and Incans would fall, and thousands would perish.
Though not intentional, Columbus would also bring disease with him, along with those following him, which would kill countless Indian tribes? Columbus and his cruel treatment of natives are also frequently emphasized by critics; he had enslaved many natives and sold them for money despite being explicitly told not to by the royalty of Spain. Further, land that had been with Native American tribes for generations would be displaced by Columbus, which gets into a whole new argument of its own in judging the justification of Columbus for this act. With Columbus bringing Europe to North America, a question surfaces as to whether Native Americans had a right to not be dispossessed of their land.
Proponents of Columbus say that the Indians are unworthy whilst opponents say they have an equal claim to their land. Native Americans had been living in North America for centuries when Columbus came. Native Americans are no different than Europeans in terms of being human; they treat each other with civility, care for their young and elderly, and have language of their own. Thus taking Indian land cannot be compared to taking land from mere animals, as it is more complicated because they are civilized people.
Columbus advocates stress that Native Americans did not use their land to its fullest potential, that they were wasting it and not even bothering with agriculture. Columbus and his followers deserved Indian land because they would actually take advantage of it and make profit through farming and other industries. Now in the modern day, there is much debate on how history should acknowledge Christopher Columbus. The sides remain the same; one wishes Columbus to be forever seen as a ruthless exploiter and the other him a discoverer. The contact of the Americas from Columbus was significant compared to his Norse counterparts because he documented it well and reported back to his commissioners for evaluation.However, he sailed the Achievement Of Desire By Richard Rodriguez direction of Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans intended goal Two Operational Variables In An Operational Environment crossing the Atlantic and landing in the Americas, resulting in the discovery of the New World for Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans. This would even lead some of the women Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans suicide. The tactic of those who hate Columbus are resurrecting Anglo-supremacist propaganda that paints all who sailed under the Spanish flag — or were Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans — as violent and untrustworthy. Dear future president it is not only up to you we Christopher Columbus: Biased Opinions On The Native Americans a community can help.